From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 4 10:47:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E2937B427; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:46:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org ([12.233.149.189]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020204184658.ROAT26243.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@bmah.dyndns.org>; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 18:46:58 +0000 Received: (from bmah@localhost) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g14Ikv035260; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:46:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200202041846.g14Ikv035260@bmah.dyndns.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "Long, Scott" Cc: "'Wilko Bulte'" , "Bruce A. Mah" , Archie Cobbs , "M. Warner Losh" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New item for -stable UPDATING... In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to "Long, Scott" message dated "Mon, 04 Feb 2002 11:18:26 -0700." From: bmah@freebsd.org (Bruce A. Mah) Reply-To: bmah@freebsd.org X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 10:46:57 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If memory serves me right, "Long, Scott" wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 09:01:46AM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > > Is it just me, or is there no linux(4) manpage for 4-STABLE? > Heh... well, there is one in -current 8-) So there is. I wonder if there's any reason why it hasn't been MFC-ed yet? (Other than the fact that linux(8) still exists, which seems to have been part of the reason for linux.4's existence.) > I had another thought rolling around my head. Since sysinstall gives the > user the option of turning linux.ko on, we might also want to put SYSVSEM > into the GENERIC kernel. It's there. In fact, this was one of the reasons that 4.5-RELEASE went out late (the kernel was too big). Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message