From owner-freebsd-mobile Fri Feb 9 10:17:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from hana.snafu.org (hana.snafu.org [206.54.48.250]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A0E37B491 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:17:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from hana.snafu.org (IDENT:marc@localhost.snafu.org [127.0.0.1]) by hana.snafu.org (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f19IGUe07479; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:16:30 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Marco S Hyman To: "Jose M. Alcaide" Cc: Greg Lehey , "Matt W." , misc@openbsd.org, mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Inspiron fan problems (was: laptop cpu fan) In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 09 Feb 2001 11:36:42 +0100." <3A83C83A.835A5C37@we.lc.ehu.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 10:16:30 -0800 Message-ID: <26785.981742590@hana.snafu.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Jose M. Alcaide" writes: > > A NOP loop won't make the processor run any cooler. A HLT instruction > > will, and that's what FreeBSD does, at any rate. I'd be surprised if > > OpenBSD didn't do the same thing. > > I wonder why apm_cpu_idle() (in sys/i386/apm.c) is referenced from > nowhere in the kernel. /sys/arch/i386/i386/locore.s:1670: call _apm_cpu_idle // marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message