From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 2 13:28:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E8B16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 13:28:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-234.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BC643FE0 for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 13:28:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB04C66DD2; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 13:28:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A6770BD7; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 13:28:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 13:28:12 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: "C. Kukulies" Message-ID: <20031102212812.GA51732@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <200311021559.hA2FxTjn003915@www.kukulies.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200311021559.hA2FxTjn003915@www.kukulies.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: spambouncer tags much freebsd list mail as spam X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 21:28:13 -0000 --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 04:59:29PM +0100, C. Kukulies wrote: > I installed the spambouncer.org procmail script and before I was switching > the behaviour from SILENT to COMPLAIN I took a look at my spam.incoming f= older > and found a lot of messages from freebsd-bugs and freebsd-mobile in there. >=20 > Both lists are not directed to folders prior to spambouncer coming into e= ffect > so they are trapped by spambouncer and I suspect that other freebsd lists > would be trapped as well. >=20 > Anyone experienced similar? Many anti-spam packages need to be tuned to avoid classifying non-spam messages as spam. Depending on the software, sometimes it isn't possible to avoid a significant false positive rate, but a good spam filter (e.g. bogofilter) is one that doesn't have this characteristic. Kris --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/pXbsWry0BWjoQKURAvL0AKCKyTv3As21HB0nrYlH1lKh39+E8wCeLSop UzTY4jwXw2HywYrTzkLDIAo= =SlSC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM--