From owner-freebsd-net Tue Feb 27 23:39: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from hera.drwilco.net (10dyn130.dh.casema.net [212.64.31.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5578B37B71A for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 23:39:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drwilco@drwilco.nl) Received: from ceres.drwilco.nl (ceres.drwilco.net [10.1.1.19]) by hera.drwilco.net (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1S82Lo20602; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:02:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from drwilco@drwilco.nl) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.0.20010228083627.0233f3c0@mail.drwilco.net> X-Sender: drwilco@mail.drwilco.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:38:41 +0100 To: "Matthew Emmerton" , "Luigi Rizzo" , "Josef Karthauser" From: "Rogier R. Mulhuijzen" Subject: Re: Quick question about IP aliasing Cc: "Jonathan Graehl" , In-Reply-To: <007901c0a13a$b4480dd0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> References: <200102280156.CAA29214@info.iet.unipi.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > > > Everybody is saying use 255.255.255.255 for an alias. Noone is giving > > > > reasons why. > >Exactly. I never got a good answer to this when I first stumbled upon it, >and I still haven't. All I know is that this is the way it needs to be done >in order for things to work properly. Ok, I meant everyone is saying use 255.255.255.255 for an alias even if it's on a different subnet. I've been preaching to use the real subnet when the alias is on a different subnet from the start of this thread =) DocWilco To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message