From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jul 31 15:09:33 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA08389 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 15:09:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA08321; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 15:09:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.7.2/8.7.2) id XAA15132; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 23:45:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by klemm.gtn.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA00567; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 23:43:15 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 23:43:15 +0200 (MET DST) From: Andreas Klemm To: "Julian H. Stacey" cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/print/ghostscript4 In-Reply-To: <199607310935.LAA05590@vector.jhs.no_domain> Message-ID: X-try-apsfilter: ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/Printing/aps-491.tgz X-Fax: +49 2137 2018 X-Phone: +49 2137 2020 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 31 Jul 1996, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Yes, both my root & jhs logins use csh, with an /etc/csh.cshrc with > umask 066 > whilst one might react "that's not FreeBSD default", > (& indeed FreeBSD src/etc/csh.cshrc is merely a dummy empty file), > although development sites might run with umask 002 or 022 > many commercial sites (& lots of non commercial too) > will not want global read on by default for normal work, > so we can assume that last ----------r-- will often get zapped. > ... So I'd like to see the Makefile set the access modes on those fonts > please, & not leave it to chance (umask of installer). I'd have to do a post-install: find . -type f -print | xargs chmod 644 Dunno, if all ports should take care of paranoid .cshrc's ... > > Ok, if you have 600 then it's no wonder. ! > All that wasted time & money fetching identical files is > .. shall we say .. rather annoying ;-) If you can change the Makefile, > we can save others time & money :-) Can we let the port be, as it is, this time ? BTW, what about a ports collection CD-COM of it's own ?!?! With distfiles for both, -stable and -current ports ... This would save space on the main FreeBSD OS CD-Rom. Then you'd have all the large source files on CD-ROM. And then no such discussions, how to split the bit. -- andreas@klemm.gtn.com /\/\___ Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH Andreas Klemm ___/\/\/ Support Unix -- andreas.klemm@wup.de pgp p-key http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~bal/pks-toplev.html >>> powered by <<< ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/Printing/aps-491.tgz >>> FreeBSD <<<