From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 21 15:51:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB5AD4C; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:51:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wjw@digiware.nl) Received: from mail.digiware.nl (smtp.digiware.nl [31.223.170.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD1D8FC08; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:51:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rack1.digiware.nl (localhost.digiware.nl [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD09015343E; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:51:50 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at digiware.nl Received: from mail.digiware.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by rack1.digiware.nl (rack1.digiware.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VyogJB-GqStQ; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:51:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.67] (opteron [192.168.10.67]) by mail.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B9315343B; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:51:50 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50ACF891.4050105@digiware.nl> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:51:45 +0100 From: Willem Jan Withagen Organization: Digiware Management b.v. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: Increasing the DMESG buffer.... References: <50ACA59D.3080809@digiware.nl> <20121121101411.GG4535@server.rulingia.com> <50ACD522.7000706@digiware.nl> <50ACEE5B.8000901@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <50ACEE5B.8000901@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" , Peter Jeremy X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:51:57 -0000 On 2012-11-21 16:08, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 21/11/2012 15:20 Willem Jan Withagen said the following: >> On 2012-11-21 11:14, Peter Jeremy wrote: >>> On 2012-Nov-21 10:57:49 +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: >>>> Probably because the kernelbuffer for it is too small. >>>> I know there used to be a kernel option to increase it. >>>> But I can not find it with the setting in NOTES or any other place I >>>> looked.... >>> >>> # Size of the kernel message buffer. Should be N * pagesize. >>> options MSGBUF_SIZE=40960 >>> >> >> Right, >> >> That was the one.... > > > Alternatively you could set kern.msgbufsize tunable. That is a fresh new one for me. Now you tell me.... :) after I've started compiling a new kernel. Need to set that in loader.conf. Thanx, --WjW