From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 12:26:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F9F106566B; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:26:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lee@dilkie.com) Received: from data.snhdns.com (data.snhdns.com [208.76.82.136]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4FA8FC0C; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:26:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from borg.dilkie.com ([142.46.160.216] helo=[206.51.1.11]) by data.snhdns.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S2LGw-0007sV-OH; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:31:10 -0500 Message-ID: <4F4CBB5F.4000601@dilkie.com> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:32:47 -0500 From: Lee Dilkie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alberto Villa References: <4F4BE02D.4020907@FreeBSD.org> <4F4CA21F.1010205@quip.cz> <201202281102.53701.avilla@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201202281102.53701.avilla@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - data.snhdns.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dilkie.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Doug Barton , Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -> portmaster Rosetta Stone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:26:26 -0000 On 2/28/2012 5:02 AM, Alberto Villa wrote: > On Tuesday 28 February 2012 10:45:03 Miroslav Lachman wrote: >> And if we are talking about new flags... is it some way to not wait for >> keypress after successful installation and displaying pkg-messages? >> >> It is useful feature, but there is some cases where I want to do some >> action right after the install without user interaction. > > Set PAGER=cat. seems a little obtuse.... what's wrong with a flag?