From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 30 09:28:18 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62929106566B
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:28:18 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2822F8FC14
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:28:17 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.61.3])
	by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6AD378CEF;
	Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:28:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2U9SGl6071786;
	Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:28:16 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Jase Thew <bazerka@beardz.net>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:13:21 +0100."
	<49D08D31.1050209@beardz.net> 
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:28:16 +0000
Message-ID: <71785.1238405296@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Chuck Robey <chuckr@telenix.org>,
	John Hein <jhein@timing.com>
Subject: Re: Final sanity pass: xdev 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:28:18 -0000

In message <49D08D31.1050209@beardz.net>, Jase Thew writes:
>Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> [2] If we do it, I would still argue for Tcl, because it is built to
>> be embedded, and small enough that you can put it into programs
>> like inetd, syslogd and similar[3]
>> 
>
>Wouldn't those properties mean that Lua is actually a better choice? ;)

http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=48.853024,2.349711&spn=0.001318,0.002701

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.