From owner-freebsd-security  Mon Jul 28 16:30:38 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA12301
          for security-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jul 1997 16:30:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.MCESTATE.COM (vince@mail.MCESTATE.COM [207.211.200.50])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA12296
          for <security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 28 Jul 1997 16:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (vince@localhost)
	by mail.MCESTATE.COM (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA06966;
	Mon, 28 Jul 1997 16:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 16:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vincent Poy <vince@mail.MCESTATE.COM>
To: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>
cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG, JbHunt <johnnyu@accessus.net>,
        "[Mario1-]" <mario1@PrimeNet.Com>
Subject: Re: security hole in FreeBSD
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970728191758.25254G-100000@sasami.jurai.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970728162901.3844D-100000@mail.MCESTATE.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 28 Jul 1997, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:

=)On Mon, 28 Jul 1997, Vincent Poy wrote:
=)> 	True but if you needed to compile -current, you would need to
=)> remove the schg flags on some binaries before the make world.
=)
=)I was under the impression that doing a 'make world' in multiuser mode
=)wasn't optimal.

	I know but when all the admins are remote, it has to be done
multiuser.  Is there a way to push the secure level up to 2 and then push
it down when a make world is needed?

Cheers,
Vince - vince@MCESTATE.COM - vince@GAIANET.NET           ________   __ ____ 
Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / |  / |[__  ]
GaiaNet Corporation - M & C Estate                     / / / /  | /  | __] ]  
Beverly Hills, California USA 90210                   / / / / / |/ / | __] ]
HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____]