From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 19 21:51:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF0B1065673 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:51:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe13.swip.net [212.247.155.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F598FC20 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:51:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=H3poPDSvFasA:10 a=fj6dw-CIB2gA:10 a=6MIg2jpqvhTpo/gR8GzG7Q==:17 a=GxPc1SQWMHlKOkJephUA:9 a=kivDu32Ki7hCD3vV2o8PZyZnGpIA:4 a=50e4U0PicR4A:10 Received: from [62.113.133.243] (account mc467741@c2i.net [62.113.133.243] verified) by mailfe13.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.6) with ESMTPA id 656081274; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:51:43 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: Kris Kennaway Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:53:24 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080818205914.GJ16977@elvis.mu.org> <20080819200017.GC16977@elvis.mu.org> <48AB3023.2030307@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <48AB3023.2030307@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808192253.26152.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb4bsd patch review [was Re: ...] X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:51:47 -0000 Hi, On Tuesday 19 August 2008, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Keep in mind that any delay at this point to address review concerns > could have been handled 3 months ago when the commit candidate diff was > first requested, and are usually handled as part of the standard > development practises we use in FreeBSD (posting diffs for public > comment with a pre-announced timetable, dealing with technical review, > etc). If following those steps after not previously having done so > means you now have to push back the timetable, that is unfortunate, but > necessary. To not draw away any attention from the old USB stack I have not made any public postings to any FreeBSD lists about the new USB stack as an agreement with some of the core FreeBSD developers during the last couple of months. --HPS