From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug 10 16:24:34 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC73D16A4DE
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:24:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D14C43D72
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:24:32 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost)
	by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.4) with SMTP id CAA07388;
	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 02:23:56 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 02:23:55 +1000 (EST)
From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
To: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <44DB0FC0.1010705@mac.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1060811020837.6010A-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Top not showing cpu usage even remotely accurately
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:24:35 -0000

On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Chuck Swiger wrote:
 > Ian Smith wrote:
 > > But since running 5.x (5.5-STABLE since 1st Aug) top can show 0.0% idle
 > > but the cpu usages shown don't add up to much of a fraction of 100%.
 > [ ... ]
 > > Any ideas why top hasn't much of a clue about what's consuming cpu? 
 > 
 > Sure, if you're running a parallel make, that will be starting up lots of 
 > short-lived compiler processes which exit quickly; top can only display the 
 > CPU load for those processes which are still running at the time it samples 
 > the system.

Spot on, thanks Chuck.  lastcomm showed a couple of thousand processes
run per minute during several hours of 'make index'; /var/account/acct
was nearly 10MB for that time.  Only one gcc but lots of sh, perl, grep,
awk, sed and such each running < 1 second, being a texty sort of job. 

Cheers, Ian