From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 9 05:07:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A969516A4CE for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 05:07:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC0043D2D for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 05:07:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3755651432; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:07:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:07:10 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Gert Cuykens Message-ID: <20050209050709.GA45153@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1107920345.41909.2.camel@codegurus.org> <420991C1.2030808@taborandtashell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Mick Walker cc: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: GTK vs QT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 05:07:12 -0000 --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:53:55AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote: > On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:29:53 -0800, Tabor Kelly > wrote: > > Gert Cuykens wrote: > > > On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 03:39:05 +0000, Mick Walker wrote: > > > > > >>Why would you make a statement like that without making points to back > > >>it up? > > > > > > > > > because i dont have points except that qt can kiss my $$$ :) > > > > > > no i am just wondering what you guy's think thats all i lookt around > > > on the internet a bit but that was old stuff about gtk1 and so. > >=20 > > I have read the QT is far more efficient and that the only reason anyone > > uses GTK is for licensing reasons. Any comments? Also, not to mention > > that QT is fully portable to M$ Windows. > >=20 >=20 > i knew you where going to say that , let me fire some counter measures > by saying that GTK2 + GIMP works excellent on windows XP Gert, this list is for technical support questions about FreeBSD. If you want to have random discussions about other topics, the appropriate list is freebsd-chat. Thanks, Kris --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCCZp9Wry0BWjoQKURAtQ0AJ40c3q2dV6lEo/PigARC7bac5KDjACgsHZv uRiJXaJRiOQcgTkCux2IYuA= =4r2b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH--