Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 18:57:58 +0200 (SAT) From: Peter van Heusden <pvh@leftside.wcape.school.za> To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: extremely slow cc1plus Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9811231852120.11242-100000@leftside.wcape.school.za> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.981120153828.jdp@polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 20 Nov 1998, John Polstra wrote: > On 20-Nov-98 Satoshi Asami wrote: > > * > Hm. The compilation (of this file) just finished, I think it took > > * > about 10 CPU minutes. > > * > > * Welcome to the wonderful world of C++. It's the best thing that ever > > * happened to Starbucks. > > > > Ok, so it's normal? Thanks, I won't worry about it then. It's just > > the package building machine, I can leave it to run as long as it > > desires. > > I can't say for sure that it's normal. Ten minutes is a long time > to compile one file. I suppose it might take that long if the file > expanded a whole bunch of templates. Since it eventually finished, > I guess it was making some progress the whole time. For another test case, my machine, which is a very recent 2.2-stable, P90, takes over 35 CPU minutes to compile gilt.cc (part of the amulet UI environment). Is C++ compilation always this slow? (gilt.cc is 2048 lines, I still need to add up all the lines from the include files) The machine was unloaded at the time, and has 40mb RAM. Peter -- Peter van Heusden | Its the 90's, and collective action is STILL cool! pvh@leftside.wcape.school.za | Get active in your union today! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.02A.9811231852120.11242-100000>