From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 26 20:50:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED8337B401 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 20:50:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.tpgi.com.au (mail.tpgi.com.au [203.12.160.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8009443F3F for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 20:50:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from agh@tpg.com.au) Received: from pen-ts1-2600-136.tpgi.com.au (pen-ts1-2600-136.tpgi.com.au [203.213.3.136]) by mail1.tpgi.com.au (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3R3oHl05390 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified NO); Sun, 27 Apr 2003 13:50:22 +1000 From: "Alastair G. Hogge" To: Nuno Teixeira , Dung Patrick Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 13:50:16 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <1051362553.c8e66a40dkt@digitalme.com> <20030426144701.GA5900@gw.tex.bogus> In-Reply-To: <20030426144701.GA5900@gw.tex.bogus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304271350.16909.agh@tpg.com.au> cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: my experience with the SCHED_ULE X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 03:50:35 -0000 On Saturday, 26 April 2003 14:47, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 09:09:13PM +0800, Dung Patrick wrote: > > Hi, > > > > My PC is an PIII SMP. I have been using the SCHED_4BSD (with > > ADAPTIVE_MUTEX) with 5-Current for some time. Now I have tried the > > SCHED_ULE (with ADAPTIVE_MUTEX). > > > > I have tried some real world applications like Mozilla, xmms, and run > > inside KDE. The performance is about the same with SCHED_4BSD. But I > > could notice a little bit slow down/delay when I switch to another > > process. For example: use the mouse to press the menu bar of konsole and > > drag it. I could see a small delay before the window moves. > > > > Finally, I would appreicate all the developers for their time and effort > > on freebsd. > > > > Regards, > > Patrick > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Hi, > > A few days ago I tried too SCHED_ULE sheduler and the first thing that I > noticed is that when I run my PII 300 at high load (cvs, compiling > programs, mozilla, etc) my mouse fails a lot its precision. I recompile > the same kernel with old sheduler and it fixed mouse problem. > > Bye, > > Nuno Teixeira I also tried ULE for a couple of weeks recently, and I was getting much of the same problems Nuno was getting..esp. with artsd in KDE and the mouse they both would become very choppy. All seems well with the original 4BSD thou. -Alastair