From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sat Apr 2 21:11:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720ACB01817 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 21:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jack@jarasoft.net) Received: from orac.jarasoft.net (orac.jarasoft.net [37.34.58.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "jarasoft.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A574182B; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 21:11:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jack@jarasoft.net) Received: from orac.jarasoft.net (orac.jarasoft.net [37.34.58.13]) by orac.jarasoft.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DCA11595F; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 23:09:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.10.10.20] (raats.xs4all.nl [82.95.230.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (112/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by orac.jarasoft.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F3E0115929; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 23:09:38 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.1.160122 Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 23:09:29 +0200 Subject: Re: Where is 10.2-STABLE? From: Jack Raats To: Don Lewis , CC: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Where is 10.2-STABLE? References: <64862.1459379077@server1.tristatelogic.com> <201603312254.u2VMsESi099019@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <201603312254.u2VMsESi099019@gw.catspoiler.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on orac.jarasoft.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 21:11:34 -0000 If you look at the ftp.freebsd.org than you can see that the 10.3-RELEASE can be downloaded. The strange thing is that there is no announcement yet. Also the newvers.sh still has PRERELEASE in stead of STABLE. Can anyone explain why this hasn=B9t happened yet??? Thanks! Jack Op 01-04-16 00:54 schreef Don Lewis : >On 30 Mar, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >> I was looking to download an ISO for 10.2-STABLE for a new build I'm >> doing, however I can't see to locate any such ISO. It isn't where >> it seems it should be, according to the info on this page: >>=20 >> https://www.freebsd.org/snapshots/ >>=20 >> Where can I get such an ISO? > >If you really want a snapshot from the stable/10 branch, look for >10.3-PRERELEASE. When stable/10 was branched in preparation for >10.3-RELEASE (creating the releng/10.3 branch), newvers.sh on the >stable/10 branch was edited to change REVISION from 10.2 to 10.3 and >BRANCH from STABLE to PRERELEASE. Commits to the stable/10 branch after >this point are eligible to be merged to releng/10.3 if approved by re@. > >Once 10.3 is officially released, then newvers.sh will be modified again >to change BRANCH from PRERELEASE back to STABLE, and the snapshots will >then be named 10.3-STABLE. > >I suspect that the oldest of the 10.2-STABLE snapshots has been expired. >I don't know why there haven't been any 10.3-PRERELASE snapshot .iso >files created since January ... >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"