Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 02 Jan 2000 15:42:24 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        Karl Denninger <karl@Denninger.Net>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-) 
Message-ID:  <200001022242.PAA31877@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 02 Jan 2000 16:38:02 CST." <20000102163802.A25936@Denninger.Net> 
References:  <20000102163802.A25936@Denninger.Net>  <20000102161029.A25883@Denninger.Net> <20000102103732.A23004@Denninger.Net> <20000102094459.B22738@Denninger.Net> <8426.946828544@critter.freebsd.dk> <20000102103732.A23004@Denninger.Net> <200001022133.OAA31402@harmony.village.org> <20000102161029.A25883@Denninger.Net> <200001022232.PAA31807@harmony.village.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20000102163802.A25936@Denninger.Net> Karl Denninger writes:
: And on what hardware do you think you can obtain 10ns resolution RELIABLY 
: at the software level in the Unix environment and under FreeBSD?
: 
: Answer: NONE!

WRONG.  

: The actual usable resolution of a timing source is determined by the 
: maximum slop in ANY part of the complete system.
: 
: I challenge you to get actual REPEATABLE 10ns results while a multi-tasking
: anything is running on the recipient of that data.

We have hardware timers that let us get into the pico second range on
a regular basis.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001022242.PAA31877>