From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 8 06:34:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B536016A421 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 06:34:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DEC413C4B9 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 06:34:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so983606uge for ; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 23:34:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=T+J0WXG4pW4Mmnt9mTmFb4osVtvxSjzcL2CtCZO3cm92ztIL1O9SVvI0JFgWtsmIcJ5bOKslnPFgorE5NGZUz1JGJ7gUPiEZHGNJpAoWOghLzLuuAY4loB0ps4gng4MYok+fhIOM69dvjmQsLrHWf9n0kD6zlhz5CUS3AFnJ6WU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GJDSFe1IPZxauzYqDLmNoCESCIOAoRspDWbAqs78gqLE8XSl9bB+gIpsinl8kcNeudtjo1go5yWwRb0PUNIQ91LZcCKQT4A9YLninF9jYsocd66SKGzSID0hC+1P1Ta979PDSf++tnH743S44EKKsqiXt1aAxpt5DxlEuRG2Z3o= Received: by 10.82.156.12 with SMTP id d12mr4653891bue.1181284472095; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 23:34:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.187.12 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 23:34:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 01:34:32 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Josh Tolbert" In-Reply-To: <20070607205905.GA45459@just.puresimplicity.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070607205905.GA45459@just.puresimplicity.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -o oddness... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 06:34:33 -0000 On 07/06/07, Josh Tolbert wrote: > Hello, > > Having successfully completed my update from Xorg 6.9 to Xorg 7.2, I decided > to install a few things, one of which required devel/bison2 instead of bison. > Usually, portupgrade -o would handle this for me, but lately it seems like > portupgrade -o doesn't want to replace ports. Has anyone else noticed this or > is there a known workaround/fix? > > (15:38:21 ) $ pkg_info | grep bison > bison-1.75_2,1 A parser generator from FSF, (mostly) compatible with Yacc > (15:38:30 ) $ sudo portupgrade -o devel/bison2 bison > (15:38:34 ) $ sudo portupgrade -fo devel/bison2 bison > ---> Reinstalling 'bison-1.75_2,1' (devel/bison) > > The same problem occurred when I tried to replace ghostscript-gnu with > ghostscript-gpl as well. > > I'm using portupgrade-devel instead of portupgrade. Confirmed, -o worked as advertised here before the move to portupgrade-devel and now does not. -- --