Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 01:34:32 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" <illoai@gmail.com> To: "Josh Tolbert" <hemi@puresimplicity.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -o oddness... Message-ID: <d7195cff0706072334s1ae309f7pe0702651076cc0d6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20070607205905.GA45459@just.puresimplicity.net> References: <20070607205905.GA45459@just.puresimplicity.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/06/07, Josh Tolbert <hemi@puresimplicity.net> wrote: > Hello, > > Having successfully completed my update from Xorg 6.9 to Xorg 7.2, I decided > to install a few things, one of which required devel/bison2 instead of bison. > Usually, portupgrade -o would handle this for me, but lately it seems like > portupgrade -o doesn't want to replace ports. Has anyone else noticed this or > is there a known workaround/fix? > > (15:38:21 <hemi@demon:~>) $ pkg_info | grep bison > bison-1.75_2,1 A parser generator from FSF, (mostly) compatible with Yacc > (15:38:30 <hemi@demon:~>) $ sudo portupgrade -o devel/bison2 bison > (15:38:34 <hemi@demon:~>) $ sudo portupgrade -fo devel/bison2 bison > ---> Reinstalling 'bison-1.75_2,1' (devel/bison) > > The same problem occurred when I tried to replace ghostscript-gnu with > ghostscript-gpl as well. > > I'm using portupgrade-devel instead of portupgrade. Confirmed, -o worked as advertised here before the move to portupgrade-devel and now does not. -- --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d7195cff0706072334s1ae309f7pe0702651076cc0d6>