From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 28 21:09:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E78E16A4CE; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 21:09:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8E243D46; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 21:09:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i9SLA52R016710; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:10:05 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id i9SLA5Zu016709; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:10:05 -0700 Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:10:05 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: "Rogier R. Mulhuijzen" Message-ID: <20041028211005.GD2411@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: wpaul@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] added WEP authmode shared to NDISulator X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 21:09:46 -0000 --5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 03:07:48PM -0400, Rogier R. Mulhuijzen wrote: > To make the NDISulator do Shared authmode (pretty much required to do > WEP it seems, at least on the AP I use): Shared mode should be avoided as it effectivly leaks your key during association. It's only very slightly better then open. That's why little effort has been put in to making it work. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBgWAsXY6L6fI4GtQRAllTAKCizq+ohFVcKaLlSERlibvx5G5eWgCglU+Q 4KVCo9gTgJbNcuMRBebTqnI= =lYy1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T--