From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Oct 30 18:10:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690C137B404 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:10:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from vectors.cx (manifold.vectors.cx [64.163.147.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC1043E9E for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:10:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from monkey@vectors.cx) Received: from vectors.cx (a386df814fa5f2b2d1d029bf3aab9b48@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vectors.cx (8.12.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g9V2CPit097785; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:12:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from monkey@vectors.cx) Received: (from monkey@localhost) by vectors.cx (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g9V2CPTH097784; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:12:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from monkey) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:12:25 -0800 From: Adam Weinberger To: Brian Reichert Cc: Larry Rosenman , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How flexible _is_ the use of ports? Message-ID: <20021031021225.GS197@vectors.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Adam Weinberger , Brian Reichert , Larry Rosenman , ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20021030150951.J618@numachi.com> <1036008702.460.29.camel@lerlaptop.iadfw.net> <20021030204056.GG197@vectors.cx> <20021030205044.M618@numachi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021030205044.M618@numachi.com> X-Editor: Vim 6.1 http://www.vim.org X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5 http://www.mutt.org X-PGP-Key: http://www.vectors.cx/pgp.key.txt X-URL: http://www.vectors.cx http://www.crackula.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> (10.30.2002 @ 1750 PST): Brian Reichert said, in 0.9K: << > http://www.numachi.com/~reichert/misc/typescript.portupgrade.1036028569 > > From this, I only see Building '/usr/ports/www/mozilla'; it never > seems to actually go though the dependancy list for other builds. > > Have I misinvoked it? Why did you use -O? If you think mozilla isn't building dependencies correctly, why tell portupgrade to omit dependency sanity checking? Furthermore, the command you issued translates to: "Force a rebuild (with no sanity checking) of mozilla and everything that depends ON IT." Were you trying to rebuild everything that mozilla depends on? Then use - -R. I think it would be helpful if you stated what it was you were actually trying to accomplish, as I suspect you'll want a different set of command options to achieve your goals. - -Adam - -- Adam Weinberger adam@vectors.cx adamw@FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9wJGJo8KM2ULHQ/0RAiO1AKDScc2H9Tp8K6bjnakuiSE9vWNU/ACdGlLN ep7lve6zDgp4rK3AuQiE5mY= =FO+0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message