From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Thu Aug 27 12:27:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFBE9C33A8; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:27:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6F7E9B; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:27:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id CA3A413D7; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:27:20 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Dmitry Marakasov Cc: marino@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r395409 - head/astro/geographiclib Message-ID: <20150827122720.GA25959@FreeBSD.org> References: <201508270944.t7R9ia0R067164@repo.freebsd.org> <20150827100953.GA78107@FreeBSD.org> <20150827105912.GF41937@hades.panopticon> <55DEEFC2.40309@marino.st> <20150827113301.GH41937@hades.panopticon> <55DEF7C2.4080901@marino.st> <20150827121623.GJ41937@hades.panopticon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150827121623.GJ41937@hades.panopticon> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:27:21 -0000 On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 03:16:23PM +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > There's nothing in PHB which forbids use of := in this case. And > the reality is such that you just can't document absolutely anything, > and even documented things may be documented wrong or be obsolete, > so regardless of whether there's documentation, judgement always > has priority. However, current wording in PHB was IMHO pessimized by recent changes by mat@. I've provided him with my analysis of situation on 16th Aug and still waiting for his reply. ./danfe