Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 20:48:44 -0400 From: Will Andrews <will@shadow.blackdawn.com> To: Justin Wells <jread@semiotek.com> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: chroot jail in pre 4.0 Message-ID: <19991010204844.A9523@shadow.blackdawn.com> In-Reply-To: <19991008170540.A1618@fever.semiotek.com> References: <19991008170540.A1618@fever.semiotek.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 05:05:40PM -0400, Justin Wells wrote: > > I have several daemons running chrooted on my box, and I am wondering just > how safe I can make things under 3.3/3.2. I will definately be using jail() > once that's available to me, but currently it's not.. Actually.. Jacques Vidrine <nectar@FreeBSD.ORG> is in the process of (has finished?) backporting jail(2,8) to -STABLE. This is currently being discussed on freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG. So far, however, I'm pretty certain that the developers will choose not to commit due to a small chance that the commit may break binaries (KLD's) built by third-party vendors (if any). Jacques questions whether there are any or not.. please see freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG mailing list archives. --Will (newbie mutt user, gotta add .procmailrc now ;) --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=".signature.simplest" -- Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991010204844.A9523>