From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jul 31 18:49:58 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA19174 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 18:49:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [128.120.56.38]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA19169 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 18:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by relay.nuxi.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id SAA07622 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 18:50:00 -0700 (PDT) From: "David E. O'Brien" Message-Id: <199608010150.SAA07622@relay.nuxi.com> Subject: Re: ports/print/ghostscript4 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org (FreeBSD ports list) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 18:49:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: from Andreas Klemm at "Jul 31, 96 11:43:15 pm" X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Yes, both my root & jhs logins use csh, with an /etc/csh.cshrc with > > umask 066 > > ... So I'd like to see the Makefile set the access modes on those fonts > > please, & not leave it to chance (umask of installer). > > Dunno, if all ports should take care of paranoid .cshrc's ... They should! Over the weekend I installed 2.1.5-R and 82 megs of packages. With my fascist root umask, over half the ports were installed such that mear mortals could not use them. Quite annoying. Could bsd.port.mk set a "umask 022"??? -- David (obrien@cs.ucdavis.edu)