Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 15:58:28 -0400 From: Alan Clegg <abc@bsdi.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DNS: having domain1.com and domain1.net point to the same IP. Message-ID: <20000929155828.D21988@diskfarm.firehouse.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10009291426290.43354-100000@bsdie.rwsystems.net>; from jwyatt@rwsystems.net on Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 02:38:04PM -0500 References: <31877.970245833@verdi.nethelp.no> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10009291426290.43354-100000@bsdie.rwsystems.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Unless the network is lying to me again, James Wyatt said: > Wow, reverse lookups only match some of the time?!?! I may be off-base > again, but I thought a lot of things wanted reverse host entries that > matched exactly for security verification. I read your last comment, but > want to know what folks think would really happen. - Jy@ It used to be that lots of things depended on this, but, with the advent of the clueless internet, people have had to turn off this test. I remember when ftp.uu.net required you to have matching forward and inverse DNS. Long gone are those days. Yes, _some_ things still require you to have working DNS, but the inability for providers to get simple things working _right_ has brought the network to a state of extreme apathy. When the response by the ISP in the wrong is "well, you are one of very few people that my clients can't talk to, so you must be broken", and that is the line that they are feeding their clients, what are you to do? AlanC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000929155828.D21988>