From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sun Oct 13 23:09:21 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FBD7B9BA9 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 23:09:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46ry7P0xQRz4g7Z for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 23:09:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1E72BB9BA8; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 23:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E372B9BA6 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 23:09:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46ry7N7369z4g7W for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 23:09:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D20FC24299 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 23:09:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x9DN9KOA029410 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 23:09:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x9DN9KaI029409 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 23:09:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239334] mail/milter-greylist: Restore GeoIP support, utilizing libmaxminddb Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 23:09:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_file_loc short_desc keywords bug_status cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 23:09:21 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239334 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://github.com/mwennric | |h/milter-greylist-geoip2 Summary|mail/milter-greylist bring |mail/milter-greylist: |GeoIP support back, |Restore GeoIP support, |utilizing libmaxminddb |utilizing libmaxminddb |implemented by Markus | |Wennrich | Keywords| |needs-patch, needs-qa Status|New |Open CC| |adamw@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #11 from Kubilay Kocak --- @Maintainer 1) Might the OPTION name better be GEOIP as 1) that what it was pre-removal= 2) Describes the feature, not the implementation. I believe this is the best UX for users and for any future changes. 2) Can/should the UPDATING entry now be removed? I imagine it should be. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=