From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 13:24:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id A3C3416A46D; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EEFD16A46B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:24:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (repoman.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F3813C4EB for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:24:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by repoman.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0PDO1CC035174 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:24:01 GMT (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: (from perforce@localhost) by repoman.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id m0PDO1oc035171 for perforce@freebsd.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:24:01 GMT (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:24:01 GMT Message-Id: <200801251324.m0PDO1oc035171@repoman.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: repoman.freebsd.org: perforce set sender to jhb@freebsd.org using -f From: John Baldwin To: Perforce Change Reviews Cc: Subject: PERFORCE change 134078 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:24:02 -0000 http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=134078 Change 134078 by jhb@jhb_zion on 2008/01/25 13:23:43 Don't set TDF_INTERRUPT to fake a KSE thread signal when a timeout triggers while the thread is still running. The KSE code controls setting and clearing TDF_INTERRUPT, so what would happen is that TDF_INTERRUPT would not be cleared until KSE finished sending a signal (i.e. never for non-KSE processes) but that while TDF_INTERRUPT is set, any sleeps that catch signals would immediately fail with EWOULDBLOCK. Thus, if a non-KSE process hit the race with a timeout firing then all future *sleep(... PCATCH ...) or cv_*wait_sig()'s would not actually block. Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/smpng/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c#34 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/smpng/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c#34 (text+ko) ==== @@ -817,8 +817,7 @@ * sleepq_catch_signals(). */ if (TD_ON_SLEEPQ(td)) { - td->td_flags |= TDF_TIMEOUT | TDF_INTERRUPT; - td->td_intrval = EWOULDBLOCK; + td->td_flags |= TDF_TIMEOUT; thread_unlock(td); return; }