From owner-freebsd-current Mon Aug 23 10:48: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from dt011n65.san.rr.com (dt010nb9.san.rr.com [204.210.12.185]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE70B14CEC for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:48:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt011n65.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA09294; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:47:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Message-ID: <37C18919.CE2F3130@gorean.org> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:47:05 -0700 From: Doug Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT-0821 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, dbaker@distributed.net Subject: Re: Weird differences in rc5 behavior on -current vs. -stable References: <46614.935394275@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Aug 1999 19:11:33 MST, Doug wrote: > > > I have a 3.2-Stable and a 4.0-Current system at home, both > > running rc5des. On both systems I set the priority in the rc5 options > > menu to '0', indicating lowest possible priority. On the -Stable > > system it's running at nice level '0', but it seems to be taking > > advantage of the idprio stuff since in general my system seems much > > "snappier," than when I was running 2.2.8 on the exact same machine. > > I think you'll find PR 12381 explains these results quite well. How does that PR explain why rc5des with the same ini file is running at nice 20 on -current, seemingly without idprio and running at nice 0 on -stable, seemingly with it? I'm aware of the discussion related to that PR, an both systems were built after Bruce committed that fix. Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message