Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 09:56:44 -0700 From: Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>, Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r460414 - head/sysutils/vm-bhyve Message-ID: <CAOtMX2j%2BxQbYUG8BZKYnCCDoT_OfMFw%2B2dGFFz09UEMx9g%2BMgA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20180130165515.GA73108@FreeBSD.org> References: <201801301620.w0UGKfQn061115@repo.freebsd.org> <20180130163232.klnyxym7efqq6l5k@ogg.in.absolight.net> <CAOtMX2gOen-W2RzDCBpfAedfN1c0XaSzs23_D_37QFL9-e6a3g@mail.gmail.com> <20180130165515.GA73108@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ok, I'll fix it. On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 09:49:13AM -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > > I thought that PORTREVISION should only be bumped when there is a change > > to the files that a port installs? > > Imagine a situation: user has pre-r460414 version installed, which is, as > you say, can be dysfunctional. How would you force the user to upgrade > the package and thus have them `security/ca_root_nss' installed? > > ./danfe > > P.S. It really helps not to memorize any rules behind PORTREVISION bump > but just think if it should be bumped in each particular case. > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 9:32 AM, Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 04:20:41PM +0000, Alan Somers wrote: > > > > Log: > > > > sysutils/vm-bhyve: add security/ca_root_nss as a RUN_DEPENDS > > > > > > You also need to bump PORTREVISION. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOtMX2j%2BxQbYUG8BZKYnCCDoT_OfMFw%2B2dGFFz09UEMx9g%2BMgA>