From owner-freebsd-current Wed May 26 3:49:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0055715230 for ; Wed, 26 May 1999 03:49:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA16260 for ; Wed, 26 May 1999 03:50:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: current@freebsd.org Subject: FTP passive mode - a new default? Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 03:50:21 -0700 Message-ID: <16256.927715821@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Unless I hear unanimous fierce outcry against it, I'm strongly considering making FTP_PASSIVE_MODE obsolete by virtue of being the default for all tools/libraries which currently examine it. FTP_ACTIVE_MODE will be the new flag for toggling the previous behavior. Given the state of the Internet today, I think this is purely a sensible change in defaults. Comments? - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message