From owner-freebsd-java@freebsd.org  Thu May  2 06:42:46 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210AB158AC8A
 for <freebsd-java@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu,  2 May 2019 06:42:46 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [18.222.6.11])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32A4277F25
 for <freebsd-java@freebsd.org>; Thu,  2 May 2019 06:42:44 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from lonesome.com (unknown [18.188.142.31])
 by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA9A317093;
 Thu,  2 May 2019 06:42:43 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 06:42:42 +0000
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: klaus4 <maciphone2@googlemail.com>
Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Message-ID: <20190502064241.GA5582@lonesome.com>
References: <bug-237208-8522@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
 <bug-237208-8522-dOPiApnCVF@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
 <1556711530048-0.post@n6.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1556711530048-0.post@n6.nabble.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 32A4277F25
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.08 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.17)[-0.170,0];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[];
 NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.58)[0.577,0];
 IP_SCORE(-0.24)[ipnet: 18.220.0.0/14(0.17), asn: 16509(-1.29), country:
 US(-0.06)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
 DMARC_NA(0.00)[lonesome.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.94)[-0.941,0];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[];
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[11.6.222.18.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2];
 MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mail.soaustin.net];
 RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[];
 FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[googlemail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
 R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:18.220.0.0/14, country:US];
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[];
 RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-java>,
 <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
 <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 06:42:46 -0000

On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 04:52:10AM -0700, klaus4 via freebsd-java wrote:
> Greg, can you please issue a "roadmap" which hardware we should support
> permanently (the next one would normally be sparc64).

At this point, my advice is not to spend time on sparc64.  I used to try
to maintain ports on sparc64, but I no longer wish to spend time on it.

mcl