From owner-freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Mon Dec 11 23:51:53 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD31EE80588 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:51:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA4B780183 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:51:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id vBBNprtL019986 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:51:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 224064] [nvme][hang][resume] nvme_ctrlr_wait_for_ready called with desired_val = 0 but cc.en =1 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:51:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: chuck@tuffli.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:51:53 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D224064 --- Comment #7 from chuck@tuffli.net --- It would be interesting to see what, if any, failure occurs without adding a specific quirk for your device. So if you have the time and inclination, I'd vote for experiment #1 to be the D13389 patch without changes and experimen= t #2 to be the D13389 patch plus an entry in pci_ids for your device with .quirks set to QUIRK_DELAY_B4_CHK_RDY. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=