From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 18:37:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615061065679 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 18:37:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961B88FC1C for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 18:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mB5IakQT002928; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:36:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id mB5IajRR002925; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:36:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:36:45 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Bruce Cran In-Reply-To: <20081205083457.283d3deb@tau> Message-ID: <20081205193550.E2916@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <0016e64ca7d690e38f045d45227d@google.com> <20081205083457.283d3deb@tau> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , af300wsm@gmail.com Subject: Re: Performance benchmarks pitting FreeBSD against Windows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:37:18 -0000 > The userland win32 API might be rather unpleasant but I was surprised > to learn to driver interface in the kernel is actually quite nice, and whatever ideas/solutions microsoft do it's f..ked up or stolen. the stolen case is actually better :) > isn't too dissimilar to FreeBSD in some ways. In > terms of performance Windows-based machines have made it into the > Top500 list of supercomputers, so at the high end performance must be > acceptable at least. maybe in raw MIPS performance