From owner-freebsd-current Sun Nov 8 20:23:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA06480 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 20:23:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gamefish.pcola.gulf.net (gamefish.pcola.gulf.net [198.69.72.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA06472 for ; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 20:23:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from psalzman@gamefish.pcola.gulf.net) Received: from localhost (psalzman@localhost) by gamefish.pcola.gulf.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA06066; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 04:22:11 GMT (envelope-from psalzman@gamefish.pcola.gulf.net) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 04:22:11 +0000 (GMT) From: Phillip Salzman To: Marc Slemko cc: pal , sporkl@ix.netcom.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, osa@freebsd.org.ru Subject: Re: SSH 2.0.10 BUG? (!) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG True. I wonder why it isn't writing to the utmp file... On Sun, 8 Nov 1998, Marc Slemko wrote: > On Mon, 9 Nov 1998, Phillip Salzman wrote: > > > make it +s > > DO NOT. > > Doing so would quite possibly introduce a major security hole. Very few > daemons are designed to have the setuid bit set, for the simple reason > that if they have to be root they are normally already root. > > > On Sun, 8 Nov 1998, pal wrote: > > > > > its: > > > > > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1310188 28 20:57 sshd2 > [...] > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message