Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 04:22:11 +0000 (GMT) From: Phillip Salzman <psalzman@gamefish.pcola.gulf.net> To: Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com> Cc: pal <pal@PaLaDiN7.ml.org>, sporkl@ix.netcom.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, osa@freebsd.org.ru Subject: Re: SSH 2.0.10 BUG? (!) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811090421540.6059-100000@gamefish.pcola.gulf.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811081938100.8174-100000@alive.znep.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
True. I wonder why it isn't writing to the utmp file... On Sun, 8 Nov 1998, Marc Slemko wrote: > On Mon, 9 Nov 1998, Phillip Salzman wrote: > > > make it +s > > DO NOT. > > Doing so would quite possibly introduce a major security hole. Very few > daemons are designed to have the setuid bit set, for the simple reason > that if they have to be root they are normally already root. > > > On Sun, 8 Nov 1998, pal wrote: > > > > > its: > > > > > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1310188 28 20:57 sshd2 > [...] > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9811090421540.6059-100000>