From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Feb 28 23:16:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA05137 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 23:16:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pimout1-int.prodigy.net (pimout1-ext.prodigy.net [198.83.18.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA05124; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 23:16:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jamesh@etsu.edu) Received: from localhost (jamesh@slip166-72-245-82.tn.us.ibm.net [166.72.245.82]) by pimout1-int.prodigy.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id CAA27626; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 02:14:32 -0500 Date: Sun, 1 Mar 1998 02:14:27 -0500 (EST) From: James X-Sender: jamesh@localhost Reply-To: zjhh2@etsu.edu To: Mark Mayo cc: zjhh2@Access.ETSU.Edu, Greg Lehey , Sue Blake , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, jhhiggins@prodigy.net, mark@vnode.vmunix.com Subject: Re: newbies mailing list In-Reply-To: <19980301020451.35068@vmunix.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 1 Mar 1998, Mark Mayo wrote: > On Sun, Mar 01, 1998 at 01:29:41AM -0500, James wrote: > > On Sun, 1 Mar 1998, Mark Mayo wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Mar 01, 1998 at 04:14:07PM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote: > > > > On Sun, 1 March 1998 at 16:22:32 +1100, Sue Blake wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Mar 01, 1998 at 01:32:34PM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote: > > > > >> On Sun, 1 March 1998 at 10:56:51 +1100, Sue Blake wrote: > > You know this will be a hot topic when you see something like > this above. And all in a few hours :-) Yeah really... > > > > > > > [See the thread for the rest of the discussion :)] > > > > > > I think a -newbies wouldn't necessairly be bad (in this statement > > > I'm admitting that my initial reaction was: yeah, right..). It > > > might direct the truly simple questions away from -questions, > > > which might in turn become the generic questions list for everyone. > > > > > > Right now, if it's a newbie question, it goes to -questions. If the > > > question is moderately advanced, it goes to -hackers when it should > > > really go to -questions IMHO. So I guess I'm saying that adding > > > a -newbies list might help successfully 3-tier the lists into > > > something a little more logical. Maybe not.. > > > > I think that is somewhat of an ideal situation. I think this could also > > tend to run into the same overlap problems that Greg mentions on his web > > page. (http://www.lemis.com/questions.html) > > Most certaily an ideal situation, but since things are far from > ideal right now, I think giving it a shot and seeing how it turns > out is really the only way to know if adding a -newbies would > improve the situation. I may regret this statement later, but nothing is ever lost in trying... :) > > > > That bieng too generic questions for -newbies, and overly technical > > questions for -questions. > > IMO, no question is too technical for -questions. I prefer to > interpret the -questions name as meaning "any questions you might > have about the operations of FreeBSD go here". So almost anything > is fair game for -questions. -hackers should be reserved for > hackers (i.e. code, kernel *source* questions and such). Yeah, but shouldn't kernel development questions be directed at -hackers not -questions? That was what I meant by overly technical for -questions. I guess I should have clarified. > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Mark Mayo mark@vmunix.com > RingZero Comp. http://www.vmunix.com/mark > > finger mark@vmunix.com for my PGP key and GCS code > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > "The problem is how do you build tools that understand your programs > at a deeper semantic level." - James Gosling > James To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message