From owner-freebsd-mobile Wed Aug 1 15: 3: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFFC237B401 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2001 15:03:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from iedowse@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from gosset.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 1 Aug 2001 23:03:00 +0100 (BST) To: Marc Fonvieille Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Better patches [long] In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 01 Aug 2001 23:14:44 +0200." <20010801231444.A26603@gothic.blackend.org> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 23:02:59 +0100 From: Ian Dowse Message-ID: <200108012303.aa19788@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <20010801231444.A26603@gothic.blackend.org>, Marc Fonvieille writes: >here's the dmesg with an old kernel and use of fa_select: Here is a summary of the significant dmesg changes: --- old (working) +++ new (non-working) - pci0: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x7196) at 0.2 irq 11 - pcic0: at port 0x3e0 iomem 0xd0000 irq 10 on isa0 + pcic0: at port 0x3e0 iomem 0xd0000 irq 10 on isa0 - pccard0: on pcic0 - pccard1: on pcic0 + pccard0: on pcic0 + pccard1: on pcic0 - ed0 at port 0x300-0x31f irq 3 slot 0 on pccard0 - ed0: address 00:e0:98:7a:f5:61, type Linksys (16 bit) + ed1 at port 0x300-0x31f irq 3 slot 0 on pccard0 + ed1: address 00:e0:98:7a:f5:61, type Linksys (16 bit) + ed1: device timeout The detected pcic0 chipset seems to have changed; I don't know if this is a problem, or just a cosmetic printf change. The change from 'ed0' to 'ed1' is simply because you have a line in your kernel config saying "device ed0 at isa?" which is reserving ed0 for an ISA card that doesn't exist. Change that to "device ed" and it will revert to ed0. That isn't likely to be a problem. Could you post the output of "pccardc dumpcis" when the FA410 is inserted while running the new kernel? I have a feeling I remember seeing some cards that specify the wrong iosize in the CIS, but I could be completely mistaken (if the "block length" lines don't say 0x20, try adding an "iosize 0x20" line to the pccard.conf entry). >This card stop working with source from before miibus was added to ed >driver, and i think it's source from around 8th July. It would be very useful if you chould track down which commit caused the card to break, though that might be quite a bit of work. >Have you any feedback from people using that card with recent stable >tree? I use a FA410TX with -stable every day in my laptop, which over the last few weeks has been updated every few days. With a 10baseT network, I have to run ifconfig ed0 media 10baseT/UTP mediaopt full-duplex but it works without help on a 100baseTX link. Does anyone else reading this list have positive or negative experiences with this card since the miibus support was added? Ian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message