From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 23 09:52:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75E4106564A for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:52:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glocke@bsdstammtisch.at) Received: from xena.netkey.at (xena.netkey.at [83.64.50.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 802C98FC13 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xena.netkey.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A538C2804; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:51:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from xena.netkey.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xena.netkey.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32345-03; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:51:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from amilo-peter (peter [192.168.0.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: peter@netkey.at) by xena.netkey.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7830B8C2803; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:51:58 +0100 (CET) From: Peter Klett To: Mark Linimon Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:51:36 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <201202201950.q1KJo7Ik086832@freefall.freebsd.org> <20120223065904.GB30350@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20120223065904.GB30350@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201202231051.36877.glocke@bsdstammtisch.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/164979: [maintainer update][patch] net-p2p/retroshare: update to 0.5.3a X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:52:02 -0000 On Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2012, Mark Linimon wrote: > Does this replace the previous submission, or was it just a repost? > It's kind of hard to tell. > > mcl > Hi Mark, sorry, yes I forgot to mention that in the submission :-( It's a patch against the current port so it replaces the previous one. thanks peter