Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 19:24:17 +0100 From: Martin Lesser <ml-freebsd-wireless@bettercom.de> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ath updates - please test Message-ID: <4EFA0D51.4080707@bettercom.de> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonAwkFXrzgSj_LP=U88YL5q2QaEE855T2rwqMUsQm5WnQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ-VmokdHhhUcyZ_2uDtZH233F9vRYJ0m2OrXaLdh662ghxgtg@mail.gmail.com> <4EF50AF4.3030105@bettercom.de> <CAJ-Vmok3ShR78uhjvK93msMmDgBHQv6WKc4sL0wGv=6zE3jRmg@mail.gmail.com> <4EFA0539.2020508@bettercom.de> <CAJ-VmonAwkFXrzgSj_LP=U88YL5q2QaEE855T2rwqMUsQm5WnQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 27.12.2011 19:05, schrieb Adrian Chadd: > "Actual ath" ? What do you mean? :) Are there plans to backport "developing" base/head/sys/dev/ath/* to the upcoming 9.X-release? ;-) > Also, the AR5416 isn't all that great a NIC, it's their first > generation 11n NIC. The newer stuff is a _lot_ nicer. So anything with > an AR9220/AR9280 or AR9227/AR9287 (PCI/PCIe) would be better. Any recommendation for this stuff is really welcome. :-) The common problem is to know which chip or chipset is used in which NIC... > I need to write up some tools to make that easier to ascertain. Stay > tuned. I will. Cheers - Martin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EFA0D51.4080707>