From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Oct 9 07:43:02 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA1D10C3BC6 for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 07:43:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE837AE06; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 07:43:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.55.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A042A14866; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 07:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w997gxpN030037 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Oct 2018 07:42:59 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: (from phk@localhost) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w997gwqw030036; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 07:42:58 GMT (envelope-from phk) To: "Rodney W. Grimes" cc: Glen Barber , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Not sure if this is an important bug... In-reply-to: <201810082255.w98Mtn1P033617@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" References: <201810082255.w98Mtn1P033617@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <30034.1539070978.1@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 07:42:58 +0000 Message-ID: <30035.1539070978@critter.freebsd.dk> X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 07:43:02 -0000 -------- In message <201810082255.w98Mtn1P033617@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>, "Rodney W= . Gri mes" writes: >> I tried running 12.0-BETA8 under bhyve on a Phenom-II+11.2 box and >> it explodes because of an unemulated instruction: >> = >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D232081 >> = >> I have no idea what importance this has in relation to releasing 12.0 > >Can you try an earlier alpha for me? Specifically A3, I think this >may be some hand optimization of memmov stuff that included a new >instruction that we did not use before. ALPHA[3-6] works, ALPHA[78] fails as reported in the ticket -- = Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe = Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence= .