From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Apr 15  5:19:53 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from ns1.seidata.com (ns1.seidata.com [208.10.211.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B4414BD3
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 15 Apr 1999 05:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mike@seidata.com)
Received: from localhost (mike@localhost)
	by ns1.seidata.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA14110;
	Thu, 15 Apr 1999 08:17:32 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 08:17:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: <mike@seidata.com>
To: Craig Johnston <caj@lfn.org>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: NT4 server 2.5 times faster than Linux
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.990414163955.12811A-100000@jane.lfn.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9904150807530.8551-100000@ns1.seidata.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Craig Johnston wrote:

> > I wonder how well FreeBSD would perform.
[snip]
> I notice that the test server had both OSes on one disk and each
[snip]

Such 'benchmarks' are pretty laughable...  did you see the amount of
Registry tuning they did compared to the amount of kernel tuning?
I always take these things with a grain of salt when the people
conducting the tests obviously have no (or very little) Linux or Unix
knowledge themselves.  *shrug*

Later,

					-Mike




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message