From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 13 16:40:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824F51065671 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:40:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A3D8FC25 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:40:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m5DGe4cF092492 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:40:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m5DGe4Ml092491; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:40:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:40:04 GMT Message-Id: <200806131640.m5DGe4Ml092491@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: sysmaint@contek.com (Douglas Wells) Cc: Subject: Re: ports/115217: Ada devel/florist socket program doesn't compile due to internal error X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Douglas Wells List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:40:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/115217; it has been noted by GNATS. From: sysmaint@contek.com (Douglas Wells) To: lippe@FreeBSD.org Cc: Douglas Wells , bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/115217: Ada devel/florist socket program doesn't compile due to internal error Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:43:38 -0400 (EDT) > Hi Submitter, > > After last updates on this port, can you confirm us if that problem was > solved? > > Thanks for your contribution to the FreeBSD Project! :) > > -- > lippe@FreeBSD.org > Felippe de Meirelles Motta I don't understand what updates have been made to the devel/florist port (I am still using gnat-3.15p_1). Nonetheless, in response to a similar inquiry last September, I made the following reply: % In any case, I should note that I just reran the bug tests and a % least the simpler programs (px_true and px_false) now work. I % don't quite see what the difference is, but since I filed the bug % the lang/gnat-gcc34 port has been eliminated, and I have installed % lang/gnat-gcc42 port in parallel with lang/gnat. It looks to me % as though the two gnat ports ought to be able to coexist without % interference but clearly something is different. I have just reverified that the test programs still work. (That is, the test program that failed when I originally submitted it was working properly last September and continues to work properly today.) I continue to be mystified about what actually changed in the FreeBSD system to actually fix the problem. But, in summary, the problem has been solved and the bug report can be closed. - dmw