From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 24 05:07:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E8F16A41F for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 05:07:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A5D43D45 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 05:07:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBO57MIA001169; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 22:07:22 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) with ESMTP id jBO57LeG001166; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 22:07:21 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 22:07:21 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Gary Kline In-Reply-To: <20051223094455.GA556@thought.org> Message-ID: <20051223220430.A1110@wonkity.com> References: <20051223031202.GA19014@thought.org> <43ABBBE0.7090402@locolomo.org> <20051223094455.GA556@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 23 Dec 2005 22:07:22 -0700 (MST) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: what am i doing wrong?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 05:07:23 -0000 On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Gary Kline wrote: > > Do I need to have the device for USB 2.0 perhaps?? Only in the unlikely event that it's a USB 2 scanner. But I thought you were kldloading the uscanner module, and here you have it built in the kernel. Don't do both--although the system shouldn't permit that. > That is the only thing that is still commented. I'll > try that later on today. As root, yes, I am able to > have sane test, not as a user. The scanner I am testing > is recognized--HP ScanJet 4100C. What do you mean by this, exactly? You see a message on the root console? > But it was sold AS-IS and may well be broken. My friend got a > *second* 4100C for $1.00 [no, not kidding]; it works on his Windows > box. ((I'll gladly let him scan things if he is willing.)) Have him test the first scanner on his system. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA