From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Dec 27 09:22:09 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA06380
          for ports-outgoing; Sat, 27 Dec 1997 09:22:09 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA06374;
          Sat, 27 Dec 1997 09:22:01 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from max@FreeBSD.org)
From: Masafumi NAKANE <max@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from max@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.6/8.8.5) id JAA23281;
	Sat, 27 Dec 1997 09:17:53 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 1997 09:17:53 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199712271717.JAA23281@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: nakai@technologist.com, max@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ports/5377
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Synopsis: Fixed port: icewm

State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
State-Changed-By: max
State-Changed-When: Sat Dec 27 09:15:03 PST 1997
State-Changed-Why: 
Submitted update is applied, thanks.

Please note that I changed the format of patch-aa to unified diff 
even though your patchchanged it from unified diff to context diff.
This is to make the size of the difference between the old version 
and the new one so that we can keep the RCS file in our CVS Repository
much smaller.
For that reason, changing patch file format among versions is *not* a
good idea.