From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec  5 21:52:15 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601071065673
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  5 Dec 2008 21:52:15 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com)
Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.190])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA878FC08
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  5 Dec 2008 21:52:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com)
Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k31so162252fkk.11
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:52:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
	:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	bh=LnKltMjDFQ+N9RzkTejo37VwyB4sEmWU7lecC/SmAPY=;
	b=Gyh8VdgVtD1ae5q50/mso1HS36dj5+3mUPMwbN/XR50IbF4jK7lzJV70TexRnmm5YX
	oE8ZG8Huit0z3HvTMNx/K3edc0ksNvXIsMoS2+yaHpKnfj+lSLJ/pY4JCjIKHbYVOxql
	oRHCqELygi+KB/70WDEw7Mtb+sNIXMTqWes/k=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
	:references;
	b=g39LY2CmRWp7zJhMkHHVqQa0QufyjNTaC0waKajYyOdMnQ4LR/WS8hhA9gH0rI/lCn
	6AIdQoXK6ULUBBKvjHJkoyoN0ofTRVn/YSblgdW9JJOEYYJ2uYmlLQQihX/hXzApGwe5
	rYbT6L+b6vQxOAG4yGQK5PVNANuNVoVVTqJio=
Received: by 10.181.55.2 with SMTP id h2mr146721bkk.52.1228512149582;
	Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:22:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.240.16 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 13:22:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <560f92640812051322h520ac67ficebbc3881907fbc2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 13:22:29 -0800
From: "Nerius Landys" <nlandys@gmail.com>
To: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <20081205190703.0dfb952d@gumby.homeunix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <560f92640811211647q551daccnaec4e8085bb8e042@mail.gmail.com>
	<20081205190703.0dfb952d@gumby.homeunix.com>
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: named and ntpd start order in rc.d
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:52:15 -0000

> This shouldn't be needed as ntpd already requires ntpdate and in
> turn ntpdate requires named. The issue is probably  timing - that named
> isn't ready.

Actually, the REQUIRE thing in the /etc/rc.d scripts means "if the
required service is enabled, start it before this one".  It does not
mean "start the required service before this one".

I had ntpd enabled but not ntpdate in my rc.conf.  Therefore the
ntpdate script which requires NETWORK and named did not get run.  As
mentioned earlier, my fix was to run ntpdate at bootup as well as
ntpd.