Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:13:29 +0200
From:      des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To:        Don Dugger <dugger@hotlz.com>
Cc:        freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why is not more FreeBSD software written in C++?
Message-ID:  <86irp1nwjq.fsf@xps.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <444A7F6A.4050206@hotlz.com> (Don Dugger's message of "Sat, 22 Apr 2006 12:09:30 -0700")
References:  <200604221603.k3MG3rmI003382@mist.nodomain> <444A64A3.2020208@hotlz.com> <86zmido6m7.fsf@xps.des.no> <444A7F6A.4050206@hotlz.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Don Dugger <dugger@hotlz.com> writes:
> Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> writes:
> > // comments are neither better nor worse than /* */ comments, and
> > they have been available in C for seven years now.
> That's pure opinion and one that I haven't head.

The availability of // comments in C99, which is now seven years old,
is fact, not opinion.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86irp1nwjq.fsf>