From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 16:13:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hackers@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B422116A41F; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:13:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F54D43D1D; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:13:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [10.4.248.35] ([206.13.39.129]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j58GJO4p068165; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:19:25 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <42A718EF.30803@samsco.org> Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 10:12:31 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050218 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: <42A475AB.6020808@fer.hr> <20050607194005.GG837@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20050607201642.GA58346@walton.maths.tcd.ie> <42A6091C.40409@samsco.org> <42A6C311.5090400@fer.hr> <42A6FF04.706@samsco.org> <42A71464.8070705@fer.hr> In-Reply-To: <42A71464.8070705@fer.hr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org, scottl@FreeBSD.org, phk@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Google SoC idea X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 16:13:49 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > Scott Long wrote: > >> Again, I'm not exactly sure how a generic mechanism can handle the >> distinction of data vs. metadata vs. journal data. Also, what you > > > I don't care about the distinction at this level - all data is treated > equal. > But for journalling to work, you must care about the distinction. Scott