Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:15:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Eduardo Morras <emorras@s21sec.com> Cc: Eduardo Morras <emorras@xroff.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: defrag Message-ID: <20080830111336.Y7476@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080829194852.EB32B1F76ED@s21sec.com> References: <20080829122434.BE7AE4FD76A@xroff.net> <20080829175932.P4133@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080829194852.EB32B1F76ED@s21sec.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > ... In logical sense yes, in physical sense no. They are video big files > (from 9 to 40 GB) that i edit, cut, apply video filters, recompress and stuff so no. but still it's funny windoze can't keep fragmentation on files that are processed in large chunks on system with lots of RAM. even stupid allocation algorithm, but with delayed allocation (searching for first available block as big as unwritten data in cache) will suffice.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080830111336.Y7476>