Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:23:10 +0100
From:      =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To:        Csaba Henk <csaba-ml@creo.hu>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [RFC] Remove NTFS kernel support
Message-ID:  <86zlu493ep.fsf@ds4.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <20080213165923.GD49155@beastie.creo.hu> (Csaba Henk's message of "Wed\, 13 Feb 2008 17\:59\:23 %2B0100")
References:  <3bbf2fe10802061700p253e68b8s704deb3e5e4ad086@mail.gmail.com> <70e8236f0802070321n9097d3fy1b39f637b3c2a06@mail.gmail.com> <slrnfqrp6g.i6j.csaba-ml@beastie.creo.hu> <867ihdc34c.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080212190207.GB49155@beastie.creo.hu> <86d4r2540f.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080213165923.GD49155@beastie.creo.hu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Csaba Henk <csaba-ml@creo.hu> writes:
> - The huge majority of FUSE based filesystems in common use are GPL
>   licensed anyway, and given this, I don't see the gain of having
>   them backed with a BSD licensed library instead of a LGPL'd one.
>   And they are as fine in ports as ntfs-3g is.

My implicit assumption was that it would be much harder to maintain a
FUSE library in ports, since it is so tightly bound to the FUSE kernel
module.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86zlu493ep.fsf>