Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:23:10 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Csaba Henk <csaba-ml@creo.hu> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove NTFS kernel support Message-ID: <86zlu493ep.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20080213165923.GD49155@beastie.creo.hu> (Csaba Henk's message of "Wed\, 13 Feb 2008 17\:59\:23 %2B0100") References: <3bbf2fe10802061700p253e68b8s704deb3e5e4ad086@mail.gmail.com> <70e8236f0802070321n9097d3fy1b39f637b3c2a06@mail.gmail.com> <slrnfqrp6g.i6j.csaba-ml@beastie.creo.hu> <867ihdc34c.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080212190207.GB49155@beastie.creo.hu> <86d4r2540f.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080213165923.GD49155@beastie.creo.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Csaba Henk <csaba-ml@creo.hu> writes: > - The huge majority of FUSE based filesystems in common use are GPL > licensed anyway, and given this, I don't see the gain of having > them backed with a BSD licensed library instead of a LGPL'd one. > And they are as fine in ports as ntfs-3g is. My implicit assumption was that it would be much harder to maintain a FUSE library in ports, since it is so tightly bound to the FUSE kernel module. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86zlu493ep.fsf>