From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 06:24:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02F116A4CE for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 06:24:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.evilcoder.org (cust.94.120.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.94.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FE943D45 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 06:24:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Message-ID: <40619A11.9030902@elvandar.org> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:24:17 +0100 From: Remko Lodder X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20040324142332.GA5549%till@score.is.tsukuba.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <20040324142332.GA5549%till@score.is.tsukuba.ac.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: for evilcoder.org cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: port{up,down}grade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:24:27 -0000 Hi Till Till Plewe wrote: > Can anybody shed some light on this? Why does portupgrade think that > upgrading from icc-8.0.058 to icc-8.0.061 is downgrading? > Constructive fault, see below > # portupgrade icc > ** No need to upgrade 'icc-8.0.058' (>= icc-8.0.058.p061). \ > (specify -f to force) -p061 means patchlevel 061.. not version 8.0.061 but 8.0.058-p061 , it could easily be that your current version was actualy newer... HTH, -- -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder Elvandar.org/DSINet.org www.mostly-harmless.nl Dutch community for helping newcomers on the hackerscene