From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 21 00:09:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9941916A47E for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:09:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from multiplay.co.uk (core6.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDDA43D7C for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:09:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from vader ([212.135.219.179]) by multiplay.co.uk (multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v9.0.1) with ESMTP id md50002672146.msg for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 01:09:20 +0100 Message-ID: <00cf01c694c6$ec19b120$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Ensel Sharon" References: Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 01:09:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-Spam-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Wed, 21 Jun 2006 01:09:20 +0100 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 212.135.219.179 X-Return-Path: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-MDAV-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Wed, 21 Jun 2006 01:09:21 +0100 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adaptec 2820sa redux, and possible problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:09:41 -0000 Ensel Sharon wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Steven Hartland wrote: > > The drives are Hitachi 500 GB 7200 RPM 16meg: > > HDS725050KLA360 > > Adaptec told me today that these drives are verified or approved or > something with that card... > > So in your case, you made multiple arrays with those drives, and then > large data moves between arrays caused crashes, and it turned out to > be the drives fault ? I would think the problem you describe would > manifest itself locally to a single array ... Thats correct. Changing the driver to always use high bit addressing if supported fixed the issue. ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.